Friday, December 13, 2019

Caroline Flack: Love Island host charged with assault by beating

Caroline Flack is due to appear at Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court on 23 December 
Love Island host Caroline Flack has been charged with assault by beating following an incident at her north London home.
Police were called to the 40-year-old's home in Islington, where she lives with her partner, tennis player Lewis Burton, at 05:25 GMT on Thursday.
Officers attended after reports of a man being assaulted. The man was not seriously injured, police said.
Ms Flack will appear at Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court on 23 December.
She was bailed until that date.
A London Ambulance Service spokeswoman said: "We were called on 12 December to a residential address in Islington.
"We treated two people at the scene and took one person to hospital."
A spokesman for Caroline Flack said: "We confirm that police attended Caroline's home following a private domestic incident.
"She is co-operating with the appropriate people to resolve matters. We will not be making any further comment for legal reasons."

Election results 2019: A constitutional collision course in Scotland

Nicola Sturgeon celebrates the results in Glasgow 
Nicola Sturgeon maintained throughout the election campaign that she did not want to see Boris Johnson returned to Downing Street as prime minister.
But the SNP leader knows that a majority Tory government in Westminster, while Scotland voted very differently, is the result most likely to advance her greatest ambition - independence for Scotland.
The party which dominates Scotland is now set on a constitutional collision course with the UK government.
The SNP's strongest argument is that Scotland and the rest of UK are moving in different political directions.
And that's been vividly demonstrated as England embraces the Tories whilst they have lost votes and lost seats north of the border.
The UK will now move on to leaving the EU at the same time as the two parties who campaigned to stop Brexit, the SNP and the Lib Dems, increased their vote share in Scotland.
The SNP took a gamble by making their demand for a second independence referendum central to their campaign. That's a policy that can enthuse their voters, but runs the risk of galvanizing people who don't want to leave the UK to turn out and vote against the SNP.
The Scottish Conservatives campaigned on a slogan of "Tell her again, say no to indyref2".
But that's not what happened. The Tories lost seven of their 13 Scottish seats and the SNP won 13. They now hold 48 of 59 MPs in Scotland, with one sitting as an independent.

Boris Johnson will refuse to grant the legal power to hold an independence vote
This result cannot be interpreted as an outright demand for Scottish independence. But the SNP will vigorously argue that it does mean Scotland must be allowed to make a choice about its future - inside or outside the UK.
Nicola Sturgeon says she won't pretend that every single person who voted SNP necessarily supports independence. But she will insist this result is a thumping endorsement of her demand for a second referendum.
She will make an official request in the next few days to be granted the legal power to hold an independence vote.
And we know that Boris Johnson will refuse, sparking a huge debate about whether the Conservatives are ignoring the democratic choice of Scottish voters.
It's a debate that can only escalate as we leave the EU - and one which may fuel support for independence itself.

Bloodhound car has 800mph target in its sights for 2021

The team now has a great volume of data with which to plan the next phase

"We're 99% sure this car is capable of a land speed record that begins with the number 8."
Mark Chapman, chief engineer on the Bloodhound car, is reflecting on the vehicle's high-speed trials this past November.
The arrow-shaped racer reached a top speed of 628mph (1,010km/h) on the mudbed of Hakskeen Pan, South Africa, before packing up to head home to England.
The team is now engaged in a review of all the data gathered during testing - from the roughly 200 air-pressure sensors dotted around the car, plus a multitude of strain gauges, temperature readers and accelerometers.
"We've only been looking at it for a couple of weeks, but there's nothing I've seen that says Bloodhound can't do 800mph (1,290km/h)," says Chapman.
The current world best, which has stood for more than 20 years, is 763mph (1,228km/h).
You can see how the trials progressed in an exclusive film to be broadcast this weekend on the BBC News Channel and BBC World.
  • Bloodhound land speed racer blasts to 628mph
  • Getting the job done at over 600mph
The length of track this year allowed the car to get up to 628mph and then slow and stop safely 
What should be telling is how, overall, the trials were conducted without any major incidents.
The team could be forgiven for anticipating a stream of technical glitches when it arrived in the Kalahari Desert. It certainly had some.
But the schedule of runs designed to achieve a steady, stepwise increase in speed broadly held together.
And only once did engineers have to perform a full strip-down of the vehicle to overhaul a problematic engine bay over-heat alarm system
"It was a high-stakes gamble to be honest in taking Bloodhound out there, but I wanted to prove that this car and this team could do it," says businessman Ian Warhurst, who bought Bloodhound out of administration at the beginning of 2019.
"We could have gone out there and been unable to run the car properly, and we'd have returned home with no following and been forced to close the project down. But it was fantastic and the engagement we saw was amazing."
An engine bay overheat alarm eventually required a stripdown of the vehicle


There's a lot of work ahead, however.
First, Bloodhound needs sponsorship. Warhurst's calculation is that £8m is required to break the land speed record.
The Yorkshireman says his conversations with interested parties have been boosted by the successful trials.
The money will cover operations but also the R&D to enable Bloodhound to carry a rocket.

A hole in the back of the car is ready to receive a rocket motor from the Nammo company

To achieve 800mph, the car needs five to six tonnes of thrust on top of the nine tonnes it already receives from a Eurofighter jet engine.
The extra power will come from a booster supplied by the Norwegian aerospace company Nammo. But Bloodhound's engineers must develop the pump that feeds this rocket with a high-test peroxide monopropellant.
And the new system will have an electric element - a battery or supercapacitor to run the motor that drives the pump. Bloodhound is about to become a hybrid vehicle.
"I want an electric solution," says Chapman. "We've talked about this for a few years and it's clear now there are quite a few options out there. It's a question of seeing what we can package into the car."
South Africa correspondent Andrew Harding presents the BBC film


The team left South Africa saying it would return either in late 2020 or in mid-2021 to try to break the land speed record.
The R&D and sponsorship schedules suggest 2021 is the more realistic timeframe.
Another influential factor is the Kalahari weather.
The rain season arrives in November and December, and has the potential to flood Hakskeen Pan. That's a good thing because it washes away tracks and resets the lakebed surface, but the car can't run in such conditions.
You have to wait then until the dryness of winter returns.
"It takes time to do the R&D and get the parts made, so it looks like we'll miss that window towards the end of 2020," says Warhurst. "But we need to keep things moving, to work to very clear timelines. Sponsors want to know when you're going to do it. We haven't finalised things yet because we need to work through the plan, but it will be in 2021, once we get past the wet season."



Climate change: Stalemate at UN talks as splits re-appear

Delegates at the climate talks in Madrid are concerned that divisions between rich and poor are re-emerging 
UN climate talks in Madrid enter their final scheduled day with divisions emerging between major emitting countries and small island states.
Negotiators are attempting to agree a deal in the Spanish capital that would see countries commit to make new climate pledges by the end of 2020.
But serious disagreements have emerged over how much carbon-cutting the major emitters should undertake.
The talks have also become bogged down in rows over key technical issues.
  • Download the BBC Energy Briefing, from October 2019 (10.7MB)
  • Anger as protesters barred from UN climate talks
  • Methane pulse detected from South Sudan wetlands
  • Greenland ice melt 'is accelerating'
Negotiators arrived in Madrid two weeks ago with the words of the UN secretary general ringing in their ears - António Guterres told delegates that "the point of no return is no longer over the horizon".

Protests led by young delegates saw up to 200 protestors ejected from the talks

Despite his pleas, the conference has become enmeshed in deep, technical arguments about a number of issues including the role of carbon markets and the financing of loss and damage caused by rising temperatures.
The key question of raising ambition has also been to the forefront of the discussions.
Responding to the messages from science and from school strikers, the countries running this COP are keen to have a final decision here that would see countries put new, ambitious plans to cut carbon on the table.
According to the UN, 84 countries have promised to enhance their national plans by the end of next year. Some 73 have said they will set a long-term target of net zero by the middle of the century.
In a rare move, negotiators from the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) pointed the finger of blame at countries including Australia, the United States, Canada, Russia, India, China and Brazil.
They had failed to submit revised plans that would help the world keep the rise in global temperatures under 1.5C this century.
As well as naming names, AOSIS members were angry at the pressure being put on the island nations to compromise on key questions.
"We are appalled at the state of negotiations - at this stage we are being cornered, we fear having to concede on too many issues that would undermine the very integrity of the Paris agreement," said Carlos Fuller, AOSIS chief negotiator.
"What's before us is a level of compromise so profound that it underscores a lack of ambition, seriousness about the climate emergency and the urgent need to secure the fate of our islands."
Reinforcing the sense of division, India, supported by China, Saudi Arabia and Brazil, is taking a hard line on the promises made by richer countries in previous agreements before the Paris pact was signed in 2015.
They are insisting that the pledges to cut carbon in the years up to 2020 be examined and if the countries haven't met their targets, these should be carried over to the post-2020 era.


Signed in 2015, the Paris climate pact saw every country, India included, sign up to take actions.
This was a key concession to the richer nations who insisted that the deal would only work if everyone pledged to cut carbon, unlike previous agreements in which only the better off had to limit their CO2.
India now wants to see evidence that in the years up to 2020, the developed world has lived up to past promises.
"The Paris agreement talks about the leadership of the developed countries, it talks about the peaking of greenhouse gases earlier in these countries, so we need to see these things," said Ravi Shankar Prasad, India's chief negotiator.
"You have to honour what you agreed."
The developed world see the Indian stance as a tactic, where they are trying to go back to the way things were before Paris, with the richer countries doing the most of the heavy lifting while China, India and others do less.
Some politicians in attendance at this meeting believe there's too much self interest and not enough countries looking at the bigger picture.
Some visitors have other things to do at the COP 

"Frankly, I'm tired of hearing major emitters excuse inaction in cutting their own emissions on the basis they are 'just a fraction' of the world's total," said the prime minister of Fiji, Frank Bainimarama.
"The truth is, in a family of nearly 200 nations, collective efforts are key. We all must take responsibility for ourselves, and we all must play our part to achieve net zero.
"As I like to say, we're all in the same canoe. But currently, that canoe is taking on water with nearly 200 holes - and there are too few of us trying to patch them," Mr Bainimarama said.

Key committee passes Trump impeachment charges

The hearing on Friday lasted on 10 minutes, but on Thursday debates went on for over 14 hours 
The US House Judiciary Committee has approved two impeachment charges against President Donald Trump, moving the process towards a full House vote.
The articles, backed by Democrats and opposed by Republicans, are expected to be voted on by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives next week.
Mr Trump is the fourth US president in history to face impeachment.
Speaking to reporters at the White House, he again dismissed the process as a "sham" and a "hoax".
Friday's hearing lasted just over ten minutes before the two articles of impeachment - abuse of power and obstructing Congress - were passed by 23 votes to 17.
The vote had been expected on Thursday but was delayed after more than 14 hours of rancorous debate. Republicans criticised that decision by Democratic Party Chairman Jerry Nadler, accusing him of pushing back the vote to ensure more TV coverage.

Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal held up a copy of the US constitution as she voted 


In the abuse of power article, Mr Trump is accused of soliciting a foreign country to help him politically by trying to force Ukraine to launch a corruption investigation into his political rival Joe Biden, a leading Democratic presidential contender.
He is also accused of obstructing Congress by failing to co-operate with the House investigation.
Leading Democrats agreed the articles of impeachment described over nine pages. They say that Mr Trump "betrayed the nation" by acting "corruptly".
Mr Nadler made a brief statement to reporters after the vote, calling it a "solemn and sad day" and pledged that the House of Representatives would "act expeditiously".
But Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz said: "For Democrats, impeachment is their drug."

What is the latest from the White House?

Speaking from the White House Oval Office alongside the president of Paraguay, Mr Trump called the impeachment process "a witch hunt", "a sham" and "a hoax".
He said Democrats were "trivialising impeachment" adding that they are "making absolute fools out of themselves".
"It's a sad thing for this country, but seems to be very good for me politically," he added.

The march toward impeachment in the House of Representatives has hit the mark reached by Richard Nixon in 1974. Hearings have been conducted, speeches given and articles of impeachment approved by the Judiciary Committee.
All that stands between Trump and a Senate trial are two votes by the full House of Representatives - one vote on each article of impeachment.
Nixon, of course, avoided the near certainty of impeachment and Senate removal by resigning. This time around, the president and his supporters are digging in for a protracted fight.
The coming showdown in the House is destined to be a partisan affair - as everything, these days, seems to be. Republicans, their ranks thinned by electoral defeat, will remain united. While some Democrats may waver, it won't be enough to stop the seemingly inevitable.
Democrats will frame this as a sad, but necessary, step to contain a rogue president. Mr Trump will suggest it is the latest effort by the powers of the status quo to block his populist groundswell.
As the calendar flips to 2020 and a November general election, the day approaches when American voters can directly render their verdict - on the Trump presidency and the Democrats who have sought to end it.

  • A SIMPLE GUIDE: If you want a basic take, this one's for you
  • GO DEEPER: Here's a 100, 300 and 800-word summary of the story
  • WHAT'S IMPEACHMENT? A political process to remove a president
  • VIEW FROM TRUMP COUNTRY: Hear from residents of a West Virginia town
  • CONTEXT: Why Ukraine matters to the US
  • FACT-CHECK: Did Ukraine interfere in the 2016 election to help Clinton?
Presentational grey line

What will happen next week in the House?

A handful of Democrats in swing districts remain unsure how they will vote on impeachment when it comes to next week's debate, but Democrats have a 36-seat lead over Republicans in the House so passage is still expected to go ahead.
Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said on Thursday they would not whip the historic vote, allowing members to make their own personal choice.

What will happen in the Senate?

The Senate is expected to hold a trial next month on the charges and acquit the president. Republicans who hold sway in the chamber appear to favour a quick vote, limiting political fanfare.
Mr Trump has indicated he would like to see witnesses called such as Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, who worked for a Ukrainian gas firm that the US president wanted investigated.

On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told Fox News that there was "zero chance" that Mr Trump would be removed from office by senate lawmakers.
He added that Republican senators would be working very closely with White House lawyers to plot a legal strategy.
"Everything I do during this, I'm co-ordinating with the White House counsel," he said. "There will be no difference between the president's position and our position as to how to handle this."



Pengsoo: The rude giant penguin that South Korea fell in love with

South Korea has a new idol - a giant genderless penguin with a gruff voice, a brazen attitude and a hunger for fame.
Its name is Pengsoo, and by most normal mascot measures, it's not cute.
It tells people not to cheer it up, is often decked in sunglasses and its voice sounds like that of a middle aged man despite being 10 years old.
Yet the expressionless giant penguin, which was initially aimed at children, has now gained a large fan base amongst many millennials who find its blunt personality refreshing.
The 2.1m giant penguin was even named South Korea's "Person of the Year" - despite obviously not being a person - even beating contenders like K-pop phenomenon BTS.

The back talking penguin

The 10-year-old penguin is originally from the Antarctic, but made its way to South Korea to become a star, according to Pengsoo's creators, the Education Broadcasting System (EBS).
Its goals, they said, were to emulate Pororo, the cute goggle-wearing character loved by children all across the country. It also wanted to be more popular than BTS. 


It's "it" because Pengsoo is neither male nor female - EBS, where officially Pengsoo is works as trainee, are keen to stress that point.
EBS producer Lee Seulyena told the BBC News Korean that the character was created to be someone the "whole family could like", targeting kids around the age of 10.
"I wanted to [make the character] three-dimensional," she said. "Cute and cuddly characters are just what adults [expect of a kid's character]. In fact, children also have a desire to express themselves honestly."
The giant penguin went on to become a hit with young adults in their 20s and 30s. The EBS YouTube channel that features Pengsoo, Giant Peng TV, has over 1.2 million subscribers.
Pengsoo is also a popular guest on talk shows and TV programmes. He's even met the foreign minister of South Korea, Kang Kyung-wha. 
But what's the appeal?
The company behind Pengsoo says its appeal lies in its ability to "not be tied to hierarchy or rank" but yet still hold a form of "childlike innocence".
In multiple videos, it refers to the chief of EBS Kim Myung-joong without the expected honorific "Sajangnim" - a term of respect used to refer to someone older or in a higher position.
It also often jokingly blames Mr Kim when something goes wrong, akin to someone blaming their boss for all their problems.
"Pengsoo treats everyone equally whether its counterpart is a lawmaker, a company president or a famous celebrity. This is really charming," one 31-year-old engineer and Pengsoo fan told news agency Yonhap News.
"Pengsoo speaks for what office workers in their twenties and thirties think (but cannot say)," analyst Ha In-Whan from Seoul-based Meritz Securities Co said in a report.
"The audacity to refer to the head of its company without honorifics and say, 'Don't tell me to cheer up when I can't,' draws empathy."


Pengsoo also brags that it's a "superstar", something that goes against South Korean society, where people are taught to be outwardly modest and humble.
According to Mr Ha, Pengsoo could eventually go on to be worth more than Pororo as its character is more popular among those in their 20s and 30s - those with greater purchasing power.
The Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade also say there is the potential of Pengsoo going global, according to a report by The Diplomat.
So don't be surprised if you soon see a giant gruffy penguin pop up around you, it's just Pengsoo. 


Spain in drive to get women into special forces


Spain's defence ministry is opening more special forces roles to women as part of international efforts to tackle terrorism and unconventional warfare.
Defence Minister Margarita Robles says the UN has called for more women to help resolve conflicts worldwide.
Arabic-speaking women are among those sought for UN- or Nato-led missions in conflict areas, such as Iraq or Libya.
Ms Robles was visiting the army's command for special operations, where some women have joined elite units.
At the command centre (MOE) in Rabasa, near Alicante on Thursday, the minister watched a mock assault on a terrorist compound with the aim of seizing intelligence - the kind of raid conducted often against insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Ms Robles said the MOE had to be combat-ready not only in terms of military robotics and other advanced technology, but also "by understanding the terrorists' social and cultural domain".
Some jobs are reserved for women, such as searching women at checkpoints.
In conservative, patriarchal societies it can be easier for women to glean intelligence from local women, who may be kept away from foreign men.
Visiting the MOE in April, Ms Robles said "we want to make a significant bid to involve more women in these missions - this is a priority".
In 1999 Spain opened up most military jobs to women and the proportion of women in its armed forces is now 12.7% - above the Nato average of 11.1%.
The defence minister says Spain still needs to recruit many more women; currently there are nearly 15,300.

Patricia Ortega became Spain's first female army general in July

Jesús Núñez, a Spanish expert on international conflicts, told the BBC "the need for special units is increasing".
"The MOE is combining all the special operations capabilities, as they realise more capabilities are needed in asymmetric wars."
He said there was a clear need for women in certain roles, for cultural reasons. "In some Muslim countries, for example, it's difficult to get information from women if you're a man."
He heads Madrid-based conflict research institute IECAH, which advises the UN and the Spanish government.

  • Tattoo taboo: Spanish woman fights rejection by army
  • Finland has second thoughts about its women soldiers
  • Why the Army needs more women soldiers
Currently the MOE has a staff of about 1,000, but only about a dozen are women, Spanish daily ABC reports.
In the Spanish military proportionately more women than men are in non-combat roles and on average they are lower-ranking.
But in July Patricia Ortega became the first woman general in Spain's armed forces. 

A Spanish woman on a Nato exercise: Spanish soldiers have served in Balkan hotspots


There have been other milestones for women in the Spanish armed forces.
In 2005 Lt Esther Yáñez became the first female captain of a warship - the patrol boat Laya. And in 2006 Rosa María García-Malea became Spain's first woman fighter pilot; later she joined the Patrulla Águila aerobatic team.
Mr Núñez said the drive to recruit women to the Spanish military had been "very successful" so far.
In Nato, Hungary comes top for women in the armed forces (19.3%), followed by Slovenia (16.5%) and the US (16.2%), according to Nato data for 2017.
Spain is behind France, but ahead of Germany, the UK and the Netherlands.
Spanish units have served with Nato partners in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa.
Mr Núñez said women had a key role to play in smoothing relations with civilians in conflict areas.
"If you are leading a unit in a village you need contact with the villagers, you need to create trust, and women provide another channel to facilitate the mission," he said.

Zambian women on UN peacekeeping duty in the Central African Republic


In April the United Nations Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, said it was vital for women to play a greater role in peacekeeping operations.
He said that "within troop contingents they lower incidences of sexual exploitation and abuse; yield greater reporting of sexual and gender-based violence; and can access local women's networks".

General election 2019: World leaders react to Johnson victory


Boris Johnson and his Conservative Party have won a decisive majority in the UK's general election.
First reactions from world leaders have stressed the importance of shaping future relations with the UK.
US President Donald Trump congratulated Mr Johnson on his "great win".
Mr Johnson said he now had a mandate to take the UK out of the EU next month "no ifs, no buts" and some EU leaders have said they welcomed the clarity on the Brexit issue.
President Trump said the US and UK would now be free to strike a "massive" new trade deal after Brexit. "This deal has the potential to be far bigger and more lucrative than any deal that could be made with the EU," he said in a tweet.
European Council President Charles Michel said the EU was prepared to negotiate a free-trade agreement with Britain. He also said the EU expected a quick vote in the British parliament on Brexit. "It's important to have clarity."
German Chancellor Angela Merkel congratulated Mr Johnson for the clear win. "I look forward to our further co-operation towards the friendship and close partnership of our countries," she said in a statement posted on Twitter.
  • Europe's press both relieved and wary at UK vote
  • World media weigh price of Johnson win
  • What just happened in UK election - and what next?
  • Sir John Curtice: What's behind the Conservative victory?
France's European Affairs Minister Amélie de Montchalin said the election had provided clarification and that EU leaders could now discuss future relations with Britain. "The most important thing with Brexit is not the way we divorce, it's what we build afterwards," she said.
Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said he "deeply regrets" that the UK is leaving the EU but expressed relief that the deadlock of recent years was "now going to pass". He said it would now be a case of ratifying a withdrawal agreement that included no hard border, while giving protection for British people in Ireland and Irish people in Britain, as well as negotiating a comprehensive trade deal.
Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz called Mr Johnson's win a "victory of values" over anti-Semitism, referring to accusations that the Labour Party had tolerated prejudice against Jews among its members.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi congratulated Mr Johnson. "I wish him the best and look forward to working together for closer India-UK ties," he said in a tweet.
The Kremlin said Moscow always hoped an election brought to power those in favour of "good relations" with Russia, but expressed uncertainty over the results. "I don't know to what extent such expectations are appropriate in the case of the Conservatives," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.